One federal building in downtown Sacramento handles both the immigration court and the USCIS office for Elk Grove. The Law Offices of David S. Chesley's immigration lawyers handle visas, green cards, citizenship and asylum. The firm's criminal lawyers handle charges where a conviction can carry its own immigration price, and California law requires a warning before any plea.
Our law firm has been featured on
David Chesley in the news
Select a photo to enlarge
Where does an Elk Grove criminal case actually go?
Sacramento County does not split criminal cases across several buildings. The Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, names two Criminal Court Locations, and an Elk Grove case lands at the first one.
| Location | Address and phone | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse | 500 G Street, Sacramento, CA 95814; (916) 874-5522, option 1 | Criminal Court Location |
| Lorenzo Patiño Hall of Justice | 651 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 | Main Jail; also a named Criminal Court Location |
Table: the two buildings Sacramento County calls its Criminal Court Locations.
A citation only has to list the time and the place to appear, per Penal Code 853.6, so rely on that document for an actual hearing, not a web page.
No Chesley office sits in Elk Grove itself. The firm's criminal work here lives on two dedicated pages: criminal defense in Elk Grove and DUI defense in Elk Grove.
Which federal offices handle an Elk Grove immigration case?
Unlike most of the cities around it, Elk Grove's immigration paperwork can go to one address for two different purposes: the John E. Moss Federal Building at 650 Capitol Mall holds both the local immigration court and the local USCIS office. ICE's enforcement side is separate, run out of San Francisco.
| Agency | Office for this area | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Immigration court (EOIR) | Sacramento, 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, CA 95814, (916) 447-9301 | One of only two Northern California EOIR courts (the other is Concord) |
| USCIS | Sacramento Field Office, 650 Capitol Mall, Sacramento, CA 95814 | Interviews for non-asylum cases, naturalization ceremonies, applicant services |
| ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations | San Francisco Field Office, 630 Sansome Street, Room 590, San Francisco, CA 94111; (415) 365-8800 | Area of Responsibility: Northern California, Hawaii, Guam, Saipan |
Table: two agencies sharing one Sacramento building, and a third one based in San Francisco.
That shared address does not mean the court and USCIS are connected; they remain entirely separate systems that happen to occupy the same federal building. EOIR's court finder lists Sacramento and Concord as Northern California's only two immigration courts and does not say which counties feed each one; a hearing notice is the document that actually answers that. For a filed case, EOIR's ACIS system gives, in its own words, "basic information about the status of certain cases" once an A-Number and nationality are entered, while warning that "not all cases, or all information about a case is displayed."
USCIS confirms its Sacramento Field Office through its own ZIP lookup for every Elk Grove address. The office runs by appointment for non-asylum interviews, naturalization ceremonies, and applicant services, as its page states directly, adding: "Please refer to your interview or appointment notice to confirm the field office address for your visit." Biometrics happen elsewhere, at a separate Application Support Center.
ICE's role here belongs to the San Francisco Field Office, whose published Area of Responsibility, "Northern California, Hawaii, Guam, Saipan," is broad enough to reach Sacramento County without naming it. That office's territory sits outside what the Los Angeles and San Diego field offices separately claim.
What can a Sacramento County conviction mean for my status?
One conviction, three separate federal questions.
| Outcome | What it means | Statute | Example grounds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deportable | Removable after already being admitted | 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2) | One crime of moral turpitude within 5 years of admission with a possible 1-year sentence; 2 such crimes after admission, not from a single scheme; any aggravated felony |
| Inadmissible | Barred from a visa, green card or reentry | 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2) | A crime of moral turpitude, admitted or convicted; a controlled substance violation |
| Barred from relief | Cancellation of removal unavailable | 8 U.S.C. 1229b | Permanent residents: an aggravated felony. Others: a conviction under 1182(a)(2), 1227(a)(2) or 1227(a)(3) |
Table: the three legal questions one Sacramento County conviction can raise.
Someone already living here faces deportability first, under 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(A): one crime of moral turpitude within five years of admission, carrying a possible one-year sentence, does it, as does any aggravated felony, or two such crimes after admission unconnected to a single scheme.
Applying for something new, instead, means inadmissibility governs under 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)(A), over a crime of moral turpitude or a drug offense. One narrow exception exists for a single such crime. It applies when the person was under 18, with more than five years since release from confinement. It also applies when the maximum sentence was a year or less, with no more than six months actually imposed.
Federal law's "aggravated felony" list, at 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43), runs on its own rules, separate from California's felony category. Because Penal Code 18.5 caps a California misdemeanor at 364 days, no misdemeanor reaches that list's one-year thresholds; a wobbler sentenced as a felony can.
Federal law also defines "conviction" on its own terms. 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(48)(A) treats a formal judgment of guilt as a conviction by itself, and treats a guilty or no contest plea with any imposed punishment the same way. A suspended sentence still counts at its full length.
Does California have to warn me before a plea?
Penal Code 1016.5 requires a judge to read this exact warning before almost any guilty or no contest plea: "If you are not a citizen of the United States, you are hereby advised that conviction of the offense for which you have been charged may have the consequences of deportation, exclusion from admission to the United States, or denial of naturalization pursuant to the laws of the United States." Where that step is skipped on a conviction that may in fact carry one of those consequences, the same statute allows a motion to vacate the plea.
A second duty exists alongside the court's own warning. Penal Code 1016.2 writes Padilla v. Kentucky into California law, quoting the Supreme Court's holding at 559 U.S. 356, 374 (2010) that "counsel must inform her client whether his plea carries a risk of deportation." Penal Code 1016.3 turns that into a standing rule: give accurate, affirmative advice on the consequences, and try to limit them where the client's goals allow it.
Is there a way to fix an old Elk Grove conviction?
A conviction can sit quietly for years, then resurface the day a visa, green card or citizenship application is filed. Penal Code 1473.7 lets someone no longer in criminal custody move to vacate it. The ground is prejudicial error that blocked their ability to meaningfully understand, defend against, or knowingly accept its immigration consequences. That standard reaches well past bad legal advice on its own.
Two events can start the filing clock. One is notice that the conviction is being used as grounds for removal, or to deny a benefit, status or naturalization. The other is notice that a removal order has become final. Whichever one happens later controls.
Sealing a record or holding a certificate of rehabilitation is real relief under state law, but neither one changes the federal result. In Matter of Pickering, 23 I&N Dec. 621 (BIA 2003), the Board of Immigration Appeals held that a conviction vacated only for rehabilitation, with no legal defect involved, "is not eliminated for immigration purposes." Penal Code 1016.5 and 1473.7 remain the only two routes that can.
Anyone facing a new plea in an Elk Grove case should have the charge and immigration history reviewed side by side; see reviewing a plea for immigration consequences, and for DUI charges, how a DUI can affect immigration status.
What else does the firm's immigration practice cover?
The firm's immigration lawyers take on asylum claims, the EB-5 investor visa program, Form I-601 and I-601A hardship waivers, adjustment of status, and citizenship and naturalization filings for Elk Grove clients. In removal proceedings, the firm files cancellation of removal applications, EOIR-42A or 42B under 8 U.S.C. 1229b, and brings a motion to reopen or reconsider when relief is denied.
Two narrower paths round out the practice. A child meeting 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(J)'s conditions, including a juvenile court order, may qualify for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status. A crime victim may qualify for a U Visa, though the petition only moves forward with a law enforcement certification under 8 U.S.C. 1184(p)(1).
The same office defends the underlying charge too, covering DUI, drug, theft, violent and sex offense cases.
Frequently asked questions
Can a misdemeanor lead to deportation from Elk Grove, or does it take a felony?
A misdemeanor can be enough by itself. Immigration law has no version of California's felony versus misdemeanor split. A misdemeanor domestic violence crime, a drug offense, or two unrelated crimes of moral turpitude can each support deportability under 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2). An immigration lawyer can check a specific charge against this list before any plea.
Does an arrest alone affect my immigration case if there is no conviction?
Usually not, but there is a real exception. 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(48)(A) means a bare arrest is not a conviction by itself. The Laken Riley Act narrows that protection for one group, though. Under 8 U.S.C. 1226(c)(1)(E), it applies to a noncitizen already inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(A), (6)(C) or (7). That person faces mandatory ICE custody once charged with or arrested for theft, burglary, larceny, shoplifting, assault of a law enforcement officer, or a crime causing death or serious injury.
Is a no contest plea safer for my immigration status than a guilty plea?
Not safer at all. The moment any punishment follows, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(48)(A) treats a no contest plea exactly like a guilty one.
Nobody read me the immigration warning before I pleaded guilty in Sacramento County years ago. What now?
Penal Code 1016.5 is where to start. For a plea before January 1, 2026, the statute says a court's failure to give the exact word-for-word warning does not, by itself, support vacating the plea. That is true whether the warning was imperfect or missing altogether. The court still keeps its usual discretion to vacate on other grounds, and Penal Code 1473.7 covers more ground and is worth raising too.
Can ICE pull someone directly from the Sacramento County jail?
Not simply on request. Government Code 7284.6(a)(1)(B) bars that outright. A transfer needs a judicial warrant, a judicial probable cause finding, or one of the convictions Government Code 7282.5 lists, under Section 7284.6(a)(4).
What does a U Visa actually require from the applicant?
A law enforcement certification is required, not optional, under 8 U.S.C. 1184(p)(1). The applicant must also have been, be, or be likely to be helpful to the investigation.
My naturalization application is already pending. Could an old Elk Grove case affect it?
It could, so act before USCIS raises the question. Have the old case reviewed against the pending application now, ahead of the interview.
Talk to an Elk Grove immigration lawyer today
A criminal deadline and an immigration deadline tied to the same Elk Grove case rarely line up. The Law Offices of David S. Chesley offers a free consultation, is available 24/7, and offers payment plans. Call (800) 755-5174 or use the firm's consultation request form.