On Thursday, the 20th, A federal appeals court overturned some restrictions that will allow gun owners to carry a concealed weapon. The majority of votes said that the restrictions imposed on gun owners are in violation of the 2nd amendments right to bear arms.This decision is being celebrated by gun rights advocates all over, who said that citizens should have the right to carry protection in public. The advocates of stricter gun control have described this new ruling as a reckless expansion of law that will only lead to more violence.California, which has some of the strictest firearm laws in the country allows residents to carry a concealed weapon only after meeting several requirement, these requirements include completing a training course and establishing a “good cause” to carry the weapon.In some parts of California, such as the San Diego County, the ability to carry a concealed was gone altogether. Unless the applicant could demonstrate a specific risk or a special need in order to establish “good cause” for carrying a concealed weapon. This new ruling may see an end to such restrictions in the future.California’s gun control rules will remain in place in the near future, however officials in San Diego County are in talks of requesting a rehearing before a bigger 9th circuit panel. Experts are predicting that the issue will be eventually be decided by the U.S. Supreme court.Thursday’s decision originated from a state law that was placed in 2012 that took away citizen’s rights to carry unloaded firearms in public, as long as the ammunition is carried separately. Before that law took place in 2012, courts would regularly uphold many restrictions on carrying concealed firearms. Many Gun owners have argued that the law and the many restrictions were making it almost impossible for a law abiding citizen to defend himself in a public place.Adam Winkler, a UCLA professor and an expert on gun laws, refers to the ruling as “a huge victory for gun owners in California.” When asked about the 2012 law banning the carrying of concealed weapons, Winkler said: “Gun control advocates have no one but themselves to blame for this ruling. You have to give someone some option to carry a gun.”What are your thoughts on the subject of carrying concealed weapons?
Legal insights
Victory in the Courts for Gun Rights Advocates in California

Any case results or testimonials on this page are firm-published accounts. Each result portrayed depended on the facts of that case. Results will differ if based on different facts. No outcome is guaranteed.
Content adapted from the firm’s existing victory in the courts for gun rights advocates in california page. General information, not legal advice; individual circumstances and current law may differ. The original publication date is shown above.
A conversation can bring clarity.
Bring your questions and any documents you have. Our team can discuss the circumstances of your case and the next steps.
Prepare for your free initial consultationKnow who you are calling
David S. Chesley, Esq.
California State Bar #236611 · Admitted June 2, 2005
View the official attorney record (opens in a new tab)A useful first conversation.
Discuss your charge and next court date. Ask who would handle your case, what representation would include, and how fees would work.
Prepare for a consultation










